Tuesday, February 11, 2014

2014 Land Rover Range Rover Autobiography | Little Notes





The R&T staff drives and performance tests hundreds of new cars every year. Because we don't have time to give each one the full review treatment, we share select logbook notes here, in a quick, easily-digested format. Unless noted otherwise, each test car is in the office for two weeks and is driven by every member of the editorial staff. Each staffer spends at least one day, but often more, in each car.
Sam Smith, Executive Editor



So the new Range Rover is pretty great. Everyone here is used to this. It stops; it turns; the interior is genuinely upscale and well-crafted; it's got torque everywhere; it'll chirp all four tires in the dry. It behaves like a vehicle roughly three times smaller than it is. Everyone's mind is blown.

New mind-blower: OH MY HEAVENLY LORDYPANTS, the Range Rover L is enormous. What happens when luxury brands get wind of the fact that certain markets—ahem, cough, China, cough—dig extra rear legroom and start building extended-wheelbase versions of things you didn't think needed an extended wheelbase? This. Oddly, aside from the fact that the proportions are now a bit off, you can't really tell a difference. Slightly more stability on the highway. Maybe it cranks into low-speed corners with a bit less enthusiasm. But above all, that rear seat is fit for a king. I could park my house in there and have room left over. Worth the money? I suppose. If this is exactly what you want, where else do you go?

PLUS:
More leather than you know what to do with. Massive rear seat. No noticeable change in handling from the short-wheelbase/standard Rover, at least if you drive like a normal person. Still fast as all get-out. Comfy, comfy, comfy.

MINUS:
Massively, hugely, obnoxiously expensive. Build quality occasionally gives you pause—I had one of the leather-covered dash panels near the steering wheel come off when I ran over a large pothole. (It popped back on easily, but still.) Rear visibility while parking, even with the standard reverse camera, is atrocious.

READ MORE: Drive Notes : 2014 Range Rover Sport


Chris Doane Automotive
David Gluckman, Associate Editor

I never thought I'd be describing the Range Rover as subtle, but here we are: This Range Rover Autobiography is subtle. I hardly noticed the little 'L' at the front of the rockers or the slightly longer rear doors. The Rangey's roof is planar, which is why you hardly notice the stretch.
Until you do. And then it was all I could see. Subtle at first, though.
 PLUS:
Stately longness and luxury.

MINUS:
The 'L' badge would make a little more sense on the back; if you can see it in its current location, you can see the extra length.

READ MORE: Drive Notes : 2014 Land Rover Range Rover HSE


Chris Doane Automotive
Wil Randolph, Web Assistant

Of course the biggest, most expensive SUV I've dealt with arrives just in time for the first portion of winter. It isn't that the Range Rover is incapable of handling snow and ice or that it isn't comfortable. The plush seats, smooth suspension, four-star hotel-sized interior, and powerful engine add up to a lovely place to spend the next ice age. But when you realize it's 16 feet long and starts at $143,000, any road seems terrifying to an assistant. Add snow, and doubly so.

Beyond the fear factor, you can tell where all the money goes when you reach out and touch anything. The only two exceptions were the wood, which seemed overly plasticized, and another terrible manufacturer attempt at infotainment.

PLUS:
It is more plush and larger than most starter homes, and it costs less than a comparably-equipped RV.

MINUS:
Some of the interior materials were a bit dodgy, and the user interface wasn't up to the price tag.



By Road & Track Staff February 5, 2014 / Photos by Chris Doane Automotive

http://www.roadandtrack.com/car-reviews/road-tests/2014-land-rover-range-rover-autobiography#ixzz2t2OdcInh

0 komentar:

Post a Comment