Thursday, February 6, 2014

News Daily digest for 05 Feb, 2014

2014 BMW X1 xDrive28i - Snowbound and Down
05 Feb, 2014 - Automobile Magazine Log-Term Tests (Four Seasons)

Everything I know about cars I have learned in two places: in high school and at Automobile Magazine deputy editor Joe DeMatio's dinner table. And when I say "know about cars," I mean "impressions of what a car is supposed to be like" rather than anything actually substantive about motor vehicles. I have picked up the occasional very minor technical tidbit, and I'm somewhat up-to-date on newer safety technology, but only because my retired parents are looking to trade up from their 12-year-old Toyota Camry for something with stability control and front and rear parking assist. But, in the main, every impression I have of what a particular marque is goes back to what the guys at my high school said about it in the hallway between classes.
So, when Joe called to tell me I could drive the magazine's Four Seasons BMW to Chicago, I was swept up in an ecstasy of high school nostalgia. "A Bimmer," I thought. "Now, I will be cool!"
You see, I came of age in the era of The Preppy Handbook and actually attended a prep school mentioned in its pages. Although I drove to school daily in my grandmother's old early-1970s Buick -- quickly named "Bertha" by my classmates but appreciated for its solid and reliable ability to ferry up to seven of us somewhere with enough personal space not to wrinkle our khakis -- the coolest of the kids had BMWs -- red and boxy-fronted with the blue-and-white propeller badge. (There was one girl from our sister school with a small British convertible sports car, which was mega-cool, but it was always in the shop.)
So I drove up to the Automobile Magazine offices in my 2001 Subaru Forester (essentially the current equivalent of Bertha: safe, hyper-reliable, definitely sensible, and tragically unsexy), hoping to see a version of the stylish BMWs that had filled my high school insecurities. It didn't have to be a 7-series of course, even a lowly 3-series would help me banish the demons of my high school automotive inferiority complex. And what did they have for me but something that looked like, well, a family car, the 2014 BMW X1 xdrive28i. Instead of a dashing sporting vehicle of my pubescent imaginations, I was getting a mommy-goes-to-hot-yoga-after-dropping-the-kids-at-the-country-club car. Was it just an updated, more expensive version of my very own Bertha-Subaru?
Those last two sentences aren't exactly fair to the X1, and they're certainly the product of my own middle-class-impostor-in-a-rich-kid-school past. To be sure, the X1 is way sleeker than either Bertha or my Subaru. The midnight blue exterior ($550 upcharge) is striking, and the front grille and lighting details give it the refined aura of something that has been designed and put together. If Mommy's going to yoga, she's doing so with her hair carefully pulled up and back, with her leggings topped by an exquisite hand-knit oversize Irish fisherman's sweater, and wearing her simple pearl-stud earrings. When you watch Project Runway, there's always that one design on the catwalk that pulls it all together: amazing lines and form that still give a sense of casual effortlessness. That's the X1, even if it is a mommy car.
So, I hop in the BMW-not-quite-of-my-dreams, and Joe starts to familiarize me with its features and singularities. That's when things get interesting. This sleek German machine, it turns out, is also full of protocols and rules. To shift the transmission, I have to press the button on the side of control stick; there is no simply moving it where I want. Each time I forget, I am reminded of my failing by a notice on the dashboard, which I must acknowledge by tapping on the iDrive controller. "OK, ja, ich verstehe, danke," I think to myself with slightly adolescent irritation. The driver's-side door doesn't open the first time I pull on the handle. It waits for the second time, to make sure I really want to get out of the car. And the split-screen nav system, which theoretically offers drivers a multiplicity of choices -- destination map in one of four views on one side and almost any other metric you want on the other -- also takes a fair amount of fiddling to figure out. It is more logical than intuitive.
After all that is worked out, I hop into the car and head west on I-94 to a weekend of meetings and coaching in Chicago. This little jaunt will, it turns out, test all the X1's protective, controlling logic circuits. Because, unbeknownst to me, I'm headed straight toward eine Polarwirbelsschneearmageddon, that is, a Polar Vortex Snow Armageddon.
I know it is going to be cold in the Windy City this weekend. On my agenda for Friday is the meeting of a national governing board, bringing many members in from California, Florida, and the northeast. Since many of us are also Facebook friends, I had watched their trepidation about high temps of five degrees with the schadenfreude that Midwesterners reserve for our weak-blooded coastal cousins who are finally faced with the reality of winter weather. But somehow I, and everyone else I knew, missed the possibility of sudden whiteout snow squalls around the southern shore of Lake Michigan. Both Detroit and Chicago had been getting snow, but nothing we don't handle on a regular basis.
Driving from southeast Michigan to Chicago is easy: just take I-94 west, and when you hit Indiana, head north on the Skyway into the city. Couldn't be simpler. The only reason I set the X1's navigation is to test it out. (One of the things I have learned about cars from hanging out with Joe is that each navigation system is its own nut to be cracked. Since the editors at car magazines drive new cars all the time, and as engineering among different marks seems to be getting increasingly similar, the peculiarities of each car's infotainment/navigation system is a major topic of discussion.)
So, I'm driving west on I-94 on a sunny winter's day, and the X1's nav system tells me to take I-69 South and then head west on the Indiana Toll Road. Ja, OK, ich verstehe, I say in my head, and then I promptly ignore this bossy German car that doesn't, apparently, even know the quickest way to Chicago.
I should have listened to the car. West of Kalamazoo, the roads get worse. What had been clear asphalt is now studded with small snow ruts. It's no problem. The X1, particularly equipped with Michelin Pilot Alpin PA2 ZP winter performance tires, handles the conditions with aplomb and ease, and I am, for once, the cool kid in the cool car driving steadily and surely in the left lane, passing those traveling at a slow though not quite crawling pace in the right lane. The automatic windshield wipers click on as a light snow comes into the air. The Bruckner symphony I have chosen from my iPhone wafts through the car with its Germanic certainty. I am in the "We don't know where the road will take you, but we'd be happy to get you there" winter television ad, enjoying the automotive highlife.
And then, suddenly, in the space of half a mile: the whole world turns white. The car's vented disc breaks bring me easily and smoothly down to a safe speed, and soon enough there are brake lights visible through the gloom as the entire highway comes to a stop.
Luckily, those of us heading westbound are safe. But the eastbound lanes about ten miles up have seen tragedy: a crash involving multiple eighteen-wheelers and several cars unfortunate enough to be amongst them has taken three lives and sent others to the hospital. Our side of the highway is closed so emergency vehicles can get to the scene more quickly. And so we sit. The snowstorm lifts, bringing a gorgeous sunset sky of light purples with it, and people get out of their cars to share news and to ponder how long we will be stuck here.
I should have listened to Brunhilde, as I now call the X1, when she told me to divert south earlier. Clearly, she had picked up information about either the snow or the accident before I heard about it, and in this case, she knew best. So, as we start moving again, I follow her directives -- ja ich verstehe, this time completely without irony -- and get off I-94 to drive through Michigan City on surface roads, eventually making my way on to Chicago.
Part of the problem was that I didn't have the nav programmed so that Brunhilde could talk to me. And I probably didn't have the traffic alerts selected. No alert popped up on the dashboard, such things being reserved only for errant shifting impulses. So, approaching Chicago, I need to switch my destination location to the restaurant for the board meeting dinner rather than my friends' Boystown condo because of the delay. Rather than using the simultaneously trusted and not-trusted BMW nav system or trying to adjust it as I drive in wintry Chicago traffic, I pull out my iPhone and ask Siri to get me where I need to go. Siri takes over, speaking to me across the wonder that is Bluetooth, and gets me there pronto. I even prop the phone up in the extra cupholder that pushes slightly into the passenger's side of the cabin so I can check the visuals as needed.
The weekend in Chicago goes well. The Polar Vortex lifts, and temperatures are above freezing. The X1 handles any and all road conditions; the parking assists allow me to squeeze into snow-drift constricted parking spots any number of times; and the windshield wipers keep my view clear front and back without a hitch.
Getting ready to come home on Sunday, weather is again looming. This time I will not be caught unawares. I'll take the Indiana Toll Road, which is usually much better maintained in snow armageddons. I program the X1's navigation system with Ann Arbor as the destination and turn on the voice notifications.
Sure enough, as I come around the southern end of Lake Michigan, the snow starts. But this time, instead of sending me south, the X1 wants me to continue around the bottom of the lake to I-94. I check the Google Maps app on my iPhone, and it tells me to take the Toll Road to the south, which was my human-directed decision as well.
And there begins a battle of wills: Siri v. Brunhilde, in a cage match of soothingly engineered women's voices. With each exit, the X1 tells me to get off and head north to hook up with the highway through Michigan, even when that means backtracking some 50 miles. But I ignore her and keep moving forward -- ja ich verstehe, now just shut up! -- all the way past Elkhart to I-69 North on perfectly tended roads.
As I head north to Michigan, the roads became truly awful. (And, as I find out later, this would have been the case all along I-94 as well.) Again, the all-wheel-drive BMW handles the conditions without faltering. I never feel pulled out of track or as if I am going to slip off the road, though this was certainly not the case for other vehicles around me. I get as far as Jackson, Michigan, and call it a night, not because Brunhilde isn't performing like a champ but because when the truckers are sliding on the road around you, it's good to get out of their way, no matter how stable the X1 is or how good its safety features are.
I descend on friends in Jackson with little notice -- "Siri, call Tom and Tod," -- and a little help in finding their place -- "Siri, give me directions to Tom and Tod's house," -- glad that I don't have to fiddle with the car's nav system as I try to avoid being pinned against the highway wall by an eighteen-wheeler. The next day, rested, hot-tubbed, breakfasted, caught up with their lives and lunched, I drive back to Ann Arbor, again with the BMW handling the conditions flawlessly. I leave Brunhilde's voice controls off.
In the end, I loved this car. Like Bertha and my Subaru, it is safe, hyper-reliable, and sensible. Unlike them, it is undeniably stylish and pulled-together in a confident sort of way. It is undeniably comfortable in how it sits on the road and how I sit in its amazing and completely adjustable heated seats. The steering wheel is both responsive and as a bonus is heated for hyper-cold days. Over time, I'm sure Brunhilde and I could come to an understanding about my impulsivity and her needs for navigational control, but my iPhone workaround works just fine for me. I wonder why car companies don't just fold on a losing hand while they can and fully equip their cars to integrate with smartphones, allowing Google Maps to show up on the nav screens.
In the end, though, that last point is a quibble. Who cares? I got to drive a Bimmer to Chicago for the weekend, safely handling one of the worst weather weekends of this winter. And I got to tick a long-dreamed-of item off the bucket list: I am one of the cool kids at last.

Body style 4-door hatchback
Accommodation 5-passenger
Construction Steel unibody
Base price (with dest.) $33,425
Price As tested $41,075
Engine 16-valve DOHC turbocharged I-4
Displacement 2.0 liters (122 cu in)
Power 241 hp @ 5000-6500 rpm
Torque 258 (369 w/overboost) lb-ft @ 1250-4800 rpm
Transmission 8-speed automatic
Drive All-wheel
EPA Fuel Economy 22/33/26 (city/hwy/combined)
Steering Hydraulically assisted
Lock-to-lock 3.3 turns
Turning circle 38.7 ft
Suspension, Front Strut-type, coil springs
Suspension, Rear Multilink, coil springs
Brakes F/R Vented discs
Wheels 17-inch aluminum
Tires Goodyear Eagle LS2
Tire size 225/50R-17 94H
Headroom F/R 41.3/39.7 in
Legroom F/R 41.4/34.9 in
Shoulder room F/R 55.0/54.6 in
Wheelbase 108.7 in
Track F/R 59.1/60.2 in
L x W x H 176.5 x 70.8 x 60.8 in
Passenger capacity 98.0 cu ft
Cargo capacity 27.6/63.3 cu ft
Weight 3726 lb
Weight dist. F/R 50.6/49.4 %
Fuel capacity 16.6 gal
Est. fuel range 430 miles
Fuel grade 91 octane (premium unleaded)
STANDARD EQUIPMENT Halogen fog lights LED taillights Matte-black roof rails Rain-sensing windshield wipers Leather-wrapped steering wheel Leatherette-trimmed interior Tilt-and-telescopic steering column Cruise control Bluetooth USB port Automatic climate control Adjustable front armrest
Midnight Blue metallic paint $550
Cold weather package $700 Retractable headlights washer Heated steering wheel and front seats
Servotronic steering $250
Ultimate package $6150 Homelink Keyless entry and ignition Rearview camera Panoramic sunroof Auto-dimming rearview mirror and exterior mirrors Power front seats w/lumbar support Front and rear parking assist Interior ambient lighting Navigation Voice control SiriusXM satellite radio and traffic w/one-year trial subscription BMW Online and BMW Apps

Miserable cold and snow the gripped much of the East and Midwest put the chill on new-car sales in January, which dropped 3% compared to a year ago. That started 2014 with an annualized sales rate of 15.2 million units, which is slightly below December's 15.4-million-unit pace and considerably below the 16- to 16.5-million units most industry watchers are predicting for this year. Not all automakers suffered the winter doldrums. A few proved immune to the cold; Chrysler's U.S. sales chief Reid Bigland quipped that "the bad weather only seemed to affect our competitors' stores." Nissan, Subaru, and Jaguar-Land Rover joined Chrysler in defying the downturn. Overall, fleet sales suffered more so than retail sales, possibly as a result of a change in the depreciation allowance businesses can take for trucks. We'll have to see whether the tax change puts a long-term chill on pickup truck sales. As for the rest of the market, the good news is that this winter can't last forever. --Joe Lorio

JANUARY 2014 SALES RESULTS, AND PERCENT CHANGE VERSUS JANUARY 2013.
GENERAL MOTORS -12%
It was an unhappy start to 2014 for General Motors, although its double-digit decline is compared to a particularly robust January in 2013. The decline in pickup sales hurt, although GM notes that its trucks have been selling with a richer (more expensive models, more heavily equipped) model mix than their predecessors.
Buick -1%
The Encore's big increase over its small initial volumes last year and another good month for the Regal (+43%) kept Buick from joining the other GM divisions with a double-digit decline.
Cadillac -13%
Cadillac sales were down across the board, even the new CTS (-11%) and XTS (-13%). The lone exception was the SRX (+2%), whose small increase was enough to give the model its best ever January.
Chevrolet -13%
New vs. old at Chevrolet: C7 Corvette (+149%) versus C6, new Impala (-16%) versus old, and new Silverado (-18%) versus previous.
GMC -10%
The Sierra (-14%) was caught in the pickup downdraft, and the big SUVs were down by a quarter in the changeover to the new model. Things would have been worse but the Acadia (+5%) crept up a bit and the big vans (+85%) surged.

FORD MOTOR COMPANY -8%
Ford blamed the weather for its decline, which was worse for fleet deliveries than for retail sales (-5%). A bright spot was Lincoln, which had its best January since 2010.
Ford -9%
F-series volume was just two-thirds of its prior-month total, which was down slightly compared to last January. Other Ford trucks and SUVs were mostly flat or down. Mustang (+7%) was the lone bright spot among Ford cars—although it still got beat by the Camaro. All other Ford cars were down, led by the C-Max (-48%) and the Taurus (-39%).
Lincoln +43%
The MKZ sold better than three times its year-ago total, although the previous number was hampered by a slow start of production. The MKX (+36%) was also up, while the MKS (-30%) and Navigator (-36%) declined.

TOYOTA MOTOR SALES -7%
Toyota, like Ford and GM, was significantly off its January 2013 total. The company downplayed the significance of a stop-sale order that came late in the month, as it only affected cars equipped with heated seats and is expected to be largely rectified for February.
Toyota -9%
Despite a significant decline, the Camry (-27%) remained the number one passenger car, but it slipped to number four overall, behind the big Ram pickup. The new Corolla had a smaller decline (-5%) but still was the bestselling small car. More negative numbers on the car side: Prius (-23%), Venza (-41%), Yaris (-65%). There was better news for Toyota trucks: RAV4 (+45%), the new Highlander (+21%), and the new Tundra (+13%).
Lexus +9%
Credit the redesign: the IS sees volume more than double. Credit the snow: the GX see volume nearly double.
Scion -18%
Once again, the iQ (-44%) is the loss leader, as all Scions were down.
CHRYSLER GROUP +8%
Frigid temperatures in much of the country did nothing to cool the Chrysler juggernaut, as the company recorded its 46th straight month of year-over-year sales increases. Only the Dodge division was left out in the cold.
Chrysler +2%
The 200 (+23%) bounced back up in January, with the Town & Country (+8%) following behind. The 300 (-41%) was a drag on results.
Dodge -19%
Where the Chrysler 200 surged in January, its twin, the Avenger, fell by half (-50%). Other Dodges on the decline included the Dart (-29%), the Challenger (-30%), and the Journey (-27%), while the Grand Caravan (+47%) and the Durango (+22%) were the only two models in positive territory.
Jeep +38%
The new Cherokee again added more than 10,000 units to Jeep's total, accounting for most of the brand's sales increase. The Grand Cherokee (+10%), the Compass (+31%), and the Wrangler (+8%) all pitched in as well. Evidently, rotten winter weather is actually a boon to Jeep sales.
Ram +24%
The ProMaster van has arrived on the scene but it's still a very minor player for Ram; if you're looking for the source of the brand's sales gain, look no further than the big Ram pickup (+22%).
Fiat +29%
After some recent declines, Fiat was able to move forward again, with sales of the 500 coupe largely stable and the 500L providing the additional volume.

AMERICAN HONDA -2%
Honda just about tracked the overall industry's decline. The Accord fell to 20,604 units, in a month that was unkind to mainstream midsize cars. At least Acura was in positive territory.
Honda -4%
The Accord's decline (-14%) put it behind not just the Camry but also the Altima and the Fusion. The best-performing Honda passenger car was the Civic, which was flat. The CR-V was up slightly (+2%) but got knocked off its bestselling SUV pedestal by the Ford Escape. The Odyssey (+17%) was the only Honda to significantly outdo its January 2013 results.
Acura +14%
With 420 units sold, the new RLX didn't do much to push Acura ahead. Instead, look to the MDX (+65%) and the RDX (+10%).

HYUNDAI – KIA +1%
Slow growth for the Koreans is still growth nonetheless, as Hyundai claimed 2014 was its best January ever, and Kia said the same.
Hyundai +1%
The Equus (+29%), Elantra (+26%), Accent (+21%), and Santa Fe (+12%) were Hyundai's biggest gainers in January, while the Genesis (-41%) dropped ahead of a new replacement and the Sonata (-26%) sang the mid-size sedan blues.
Kia +2%
The Rio (+28%), the Soul (+10%), and the new Cadenza helped Kia overcome declines for the Sorento and the Optima (both -11%).

NISSAN NORTH AMERICA +12%
Nissan enjoyed one of the biggest increases of any major manufacturer. Infiniti's year-over-year increase actually outpaced Nissan division's, which posted a January record.
Nissan +10%
Most of Nissan's action was on the truck side. One might expect big gains for the new Rogue (+54%), but the Frontier (+88%), and the Xterra (+52%)? Meanwhile, the Murano was down (-27%), as was the new Pathfinder (-16%), while the Titan (-36%) continues to drift lower. Of the passenger cars, Leaf sales nearly doubled and the Juke jumped (+46%), while the Versa (-17%) and the Cube (-25%) dropped.
Infiniti +26%
Infiniti was feeling the affect of the new Q50 in January. The other models pitched in as well, most importantly the JX/QX60 (+21%). Only the big SUV, the QX56/QX80 was down (-12%).

VOLKSWAGEN GROUP -13%
Once again, the Volkswagen brand dragged down the results for the Volkswagen Group, but this time Audi and Porsche were less able to stem the loss.
Volkswagen -19%
Volkswagen blames a sell-down prior to a new-model changeover for depressed sales of the Golf (-35%), but that doesn't explain the Passat (-30%), the Tiguan (-16%), or the Touareg (-44%). And last year's bright spot has gone dim, as the Beetle (-9%) is now tracking against the revised version rather than the old model.
Audi +0%
Increases for the Q5 (+18%), the Q7 (+43%), and the A6 (+18%) overcame weakness in the A4 (-11%), the A5 (-23%), and the A8 (-33%).
Porsche -8%
The Cayenne (-23%) declined, due, Porsche says, to low availability. Trouble is, the Boxster, the 911, and the Panamera were down as well.
Bentley +2%
Lamborghini +2%

DAIMLER-BENZ +2%
Model proliferation is helping to put Mercedes-Benz well out in front as this year's luxury derby gets started.
Mercedes-Benz +1%
The CLA's 2433 units is down from its previous months' totals, but still was critical to the brand's year-over-year growth. The CLA, the new S-class (+37%), and the Sprinter (+20%) had to counter losses elsewhere in the lineup. The C-class (-20%) has the best excuse—a new version about to arrive and, possibly, some cross-shopping with the new CLA—but all other Mercedes models declined as well.
Smart +8%
Smart crept up in January. And that was before its wacky Super Bowl commercial aired.
SUBARU +19%
Subaru looks to make 2014 another record year, given the start it got in January. The Forester's big increase (+65%) was versus the old model last year, but there's no such caveat for the XV Crosstrek (+73%). The BRZ (+28%) is still on the upswing, and so is the WRX (+17%), with the latter soon to be replaced with a new version. So, too, will the Legacy (-14%), both of which should help keep Subaru's momentum going.

BMW GROUP +3%
Despite a strong surge by BMW, the brand remained well behind Mercedes-Benz.
BMW +11%
The 3 Series/4 Series combo (+34%) is still benefitting from the arrival of the new coupes. This month, though, the good news extended to the 5 Series (+27%), the 6 Series (+20%), the X3 (+35%), and the X1 (+14%) as well. Only the X5 (-33%) missed the party.
Mini -31%
A big decline for the standard Mini we can understand, what with the new one about to arrive, but what happened to the Countryman (-24%)?
Rolls-Royce +2%

MAZDA -12%
The new Mazda6 was up by nearly half (+48%), but that was the extent of the brand's good news. Even the formerly hot CX-5 (-5%) appears to be taking a breather. Mazda says that availability of the new Mazda3 (-23%) should improve with a new factory coming on stream. Let's hope so.

JAGUAR LAND ROVER +15%
Jaguar +31%
Jaguar's January increase was about split between the new F-Type and the XF (+29%).
Land Rover +11%
The new Range Rover Sport (+29%) has arrived on the scene, and its presence is being felt at Land Rover.

MITSUBISHI +5%
The new Outlander was up by half, and the Outlander Sport by a third, but uh-oh, what's this? Only one i-MiEV was sold.

VOLVO -22%
A big drop for the XC60 (-40%) is not good news for Volvo, and a doubling of S80 sales doesn't make up for it.

TOP 10 BESTSELLING NAMEPLATES IN JANUARY
1. Ford F-series 46,536
2. Chevrolet Silverado 28,926
3. Dodge Ram 25,071
4. Toyota Camry 23,323
5. Toyota Corolla/Matrix 22,753
6. Nissan Altima 22,515
7. Honda Civic 21,824
8. Ford Fusion 20,717
9. Honda Accord 20,604
10. Ford Escape 19,459

Celebrating the twenty-year anniversary of its boisterous Avant RS2, Audi has announced that it will introduce a special-edition Audi RS 4 Avant Nogaro model. This ultimate hot hatch will seek to continue the RS2's legacy of high-revving power and capable all-wheel-drive dynamic handling when it debuts at the 2014 Geneva auto show in March.
The original Audi Avant RS2, which was the first high-performance RS model from Audi, arrived in 1994. With its 2.2-liter five-cylinder engine and hefty turbocharger, the all-wheel-drive Audi Avant RS2 produced 315 hp and 302 lb-ft of torque. Porsche aided with the RS2's development, combining high-end performance with the everyday usability and versatility of an all-wheel-drive hatchback. Power fed all four wheels (17-inchers from Porsche) via a six-speed manual gearbox, and drivers could manually activate a locking rear-axle differential for added stability.
Audi's modern interpretation, the Audi RS 4 Avant Nogaro, attempts to preserve the look and spirit of the celebrated mid-90s classic. Customized special-edition Nogaro blue pearl-effect paint carries over from the 1994 Audi Avant RS2, and matte black finish on the RS sport exhaust and roof racks complete the homage alongside the black-gloss trim grille and window slots. Like its predecessor, the Audi RS 4 Avant's interior is clad in a combination of high-quality leather and Alcantara, with special blue stitching among many other blue trim elements to celebrate the twenty-year anniversary of the Avant RS2.
The Audi RS 4 Avant Nogaro is more than skin deep, however. Like in the regular 2014 Audi RS 4 Avant, 450 hp and 317 lb-ft of torque are available from the RS 4 Avant's 4.2-liter naturally-aspirated V-8, which is similar to the engine in the base Audi R8. Quattro all-wheel-drive is standard, as is Audi's seven-speed dual-clutch automatic transmission. The Nogaro edition is complete with 20-inch wheels and red RS-badged brake calipers, with carbon fiber ceramic disc brakes as an available upgrade on the front axle. A sport differential and RS sport suspension make the Audi RS 4 Avant Nogaro a force to be reckoned with through the curves.
The original Audi Avant RS2 from 1994 could sprint from 0-62 mph in just 5.4 seconds in its way to a 162 mph top speed, while the modern Audi RS 4 Nogaro can do the same sprint in 4.7 seconds with a 174-mph top speed. Considering that twenty years of automotive innovation has resulted in the RS 4 Avant Nogaro cutting less than a second of the RS2's 0-62 mph sprint, it is no surprise that the original RS2 is one of the most sought-after performance cars from that era. Over the course of its brief two years of production and availability in Europe, only 2,908 RS2 units were built.
Starting price for the Europe-only RS 4 Avant Nogaro is set at €87,300 (about $118,000). For more information and photos on the 2014 Audi RS 4 Avant Nogaro, follow our coverage of the 2014 Geneva auto show in March.

Last week we wondered which new Audi model was being teased from inside a mysterious delivery truck. As it turns out, this new model which will debut next week is not the 2016 Audi TT as we previously thought, but instead appears to be a sporty variant of the Audi A1 compact hatchback that's not sold in the U.S.
This extended teaser shows a few quick peeks at the new Audi, including a silhouette that clearly shows that this new Audi is a two-door hatchback with a greenhouse that mirrors that of the Audi A1. Other clues like the manual shift knob and sport seats we see in this video make us think that this new model will be a high-performance Audi S1 variant of the A1 that slots below the A3 in the European market. This hot hatch would give Audi a competitor for other small, high-powered hatchbacks like the Fiat 500 Abarth, the Mini Cooper S, and the Volkswagen Polo GTI.
In Europe, the standard Audi A1 is offered with a range of small four-cylinder gasoline and diesel engines. We've previously heard that an Audi S1 was under consideration, which would use the same supercharged and turbocharged 1.4-liter gasoline four-cylinder as the Volkswagen Polo GTI. Quattro all-wheel-drive will presumably come standard, as will a seven-speed dual-clutch transmission.
Keep an eye out for the official reveal next Wednesday, February 12 to see the Audi S1 in its entirety and just what performance tricks are in store for Audi's subcompact hatchback.

The Problem: A defect in the accelerator pedal arm can break, meaning that the driver cannot increase engine speed and the vehicle will return to idle. Aston Martin says it has not received any reports of accidents or injuries so far.
The Fix: Aston Martin has already sent out letters notifying owners of the recall. Aston Martin dealerships will then replace the accelerator pedal assembly at no charge.
Number of Vehicles Potentially Affected: In the U.S. this recall comprises 5001 Aston Martin models produced between the end of 2007 and October 2013. This includes the 2008-2014 Aston Martin DB9 and V8 Vantage; the 2009-2012 Aston Martin DBS; the 2010-2012 Aston Martin Rapide and 2014 Rapide S; the 2011-2012 Aston Martin V12 Vantage; the 2011-2014 Aston Martin V8 Vantage S; and the 2012 Aston Martin Virage.

Last redesigned in 2010, the BMW X3 is being updated, with the 2015 model set to go on sale this spring. Interior and exterior changes as well as two new model variants are designed to help the X3 stay competitive in a growing premium small SUV segment.
New to the BMW X3 family is the X3 sDrive 28i and the X3 xDrive 28d, while the xDrive 28i and xDrive 35i continue. The BMW X3 sDrive 28i is the first and only rear-wheel-drive BMW X3 available in the U.S. market, and will be equipped with the same turbocharged 2.0-liter four-cylinder engine, making 240 hp and 260 lb-ft of torque, paired with BMW's 8-speed automatic transmission. Also available for the first time in the States is the diesel-powered, all-wheel-drive X3 xDrive 28d, with the now-familiar 2.0-liter turbodiesel unit featured in the BMW 328d. That engine makes 180 hp and 280 lb-ft of torque, the latter available from 1750 rpm, and also utilizes an 8-speed automatic. 0-60 mph can be reached in just under 8.0 seconds, versus the swifter 6.2 seconds achievable in the X3 sDrive 28i.
Fuel economy numbers have not been released for either new model, but it would be safe to bet that the X3 sDrive 28i will be slightly more efficient than its all-wheel-drive variant, which is rated at 28 mpg on the highway. Expect significantly better mileage from the diesel version. The 2015 BMW X3 also adopts sharper, more aggressive looks than its predecessor. New twin-circular headlights lead the way, flanking a higher-contrast kidney grille and sportier front bumper and intakes. Around back, the X3's rear bumper takes on a more refined character with a metallic insert. The new headlights can be had as full LEDs to match the LED lower fog lights; there are also LED turn indicators, now housed in the exterior side mirrors. Inside, the BMW X3 receives chrome trim changes and a high-gloss black panel display, as well as new cup holders that feature a sliding cover. Four new exterior colors, new upholstery and trim options, and new wheels also are available.
Pricing for the xDrive 28i and xDrive 35i will remain at $40,725 and $45,825, respectively. The new 2015 BMW X3 xDrive 28d will start at $42,825, while the sDrive 28i will be the most affordable variant, at $39,325. All prices include destination charges.
Look for the new 2015 BMW X3 to hit showrooms in spring 2014. Until then, check out the photo gallery above and stay tuned for more information.

--
Powered by rssforward.com




Wednesday, February 5, 2014

Comparison: 2013 Buick Encore AWD vs. BMW X1 xDrive28i

Premium subcompact crossovers, already popular in Europe, look to be heading en masse to the North American market. Making their rounds of the U.S. auto show circuit are, for example, the Mercedes-Benz GLA-class and its hot AMG variant, the Audi Q3, and the soon-to-be-produced Infiniti Q30 concept. These crossoversoffer much of the practicality that's made crossovers of all sizes so popular -- tons of useable space, a high seating position, versatility, and a modicum of rough road capability (Don't even think about going off-road: all-wheel-drive is included only as a favor to Snowbelt buyers and in recognition that shoppers expect crossovers to power both axles.) But what premium subcompact crossovers promise that larger, generally cheaper compact crossovers like the Honda CR-V and Ford Escape cannot is prestige. Think of it as the perfect vehicle for a hip, young, well-educated couple and their newborn's Maclaren stroller as they fight for parking space in Brooklyn's Williamsburg -- and in all the Williamsburgs in metro areas across the nation.

The crossovers we have here, the BMW X1 and Buick Encore, represent the leading edge of this trend. Both are small enough for the city parking space, thrifty enough for $4-a-gallon gasoline, and are flashier than similarly priced compact crossovers. The X1 is significantly smaller (6.5 inches shorter, 3.3 inches narrower) than the X3, less thirsty (22/33 mpg to 21/28 mpg), and, with a starting price of $31,825, nearly $6350 cheaper.The Encore starts for $25,085 and clearly hopes to mimic the appeal of the three-row Enclave in a cutesy B-segment footprint.

Despite gunning for the same type of new customer, BMW and Buick offer wholly dissimilar vehicles. The first clue comes when the cars are parked nose-to-nose. The X1, based on the last BMW 3-Series, is a leanstation wagon with an increased ride height. The Encore, built in South Korea on the bones of the Chevrolet Spark and Sonic, is 4.4 inches taller than the BMW but has a smaller footprint than Buick's own Verano, resulting in an awkward hatchback shape.

Each employs styling cues that have trickled down from other models in the range. The Buickflaunts a waterfall chrome grille, chrome wheels, blue-tinged headlights, and, naturally, "ventiports" on the hood. The BMW wears sharp body creases, geometric taillights, and a steeply angled rear windshield. It is taut, precise, and tidy in comparison to the Buick's soft curves and squished proportions.

The BMW feels tauter than the Buick from the behind the wheel, too. Communicative steering and a positively sporty suspension allow you to place the X1 exactly where you want it, making for big fun on winding roads. It's the polar opposite of the Encore, which is let down by numb steering that aggressively springs back to center, a ride that floats and bounces, and body roll exaggerated by the high seating position. On the other hand, the Buick has a smooth, comfortable ride that soaks up every bump, and its light steering enhances maneuverability in the city.That makes us all the more frustrated with the way the X1's busy suspensiontelegraphs every pavement imperfection to the cabin. It's jarring on all but the most perfect roads. The weightysteering, so rewarding on twisting two-lanes,becomes a chore on tight downtown streets.

The X1 is likewise the more athletic in a straight line, thanks to its 240-hp,2.0-liter turbofour-cylinder. The engine and eight-speed automatic transmission make short work of any speed limit. If anything, it's unnecessarily fast for this type of car.No one will think that's the case with theEncore. A healthy amount of low-end torque helps it squirt through city traffic with ease, but the 138-hp, 1.4-liter turbo quickly runs out of steam as speed builds. At least the engine is quiet and its attendant six-speed automatic issmooth.

Ultimately, either car drives well enough for buyers who will spend their time traipsing around cities and suburbs. The more important test is whether the crossovers have adequate space for carpooling with friends and transporting Costco binges.Though the BMW offers more cargo capacity than the Buick on paper, with 27.6 versus 18.8 cubic feet, the Encore is roomier than it appears on the outside. Two suitcases fit in the cargo area even with the back seats raised, and tall rear-seat passengers suffer neither scraped knees norbanged heads.

Those passengers may suffer vehicular envy, however, when they see the BMW X1's handsome interior. Black, gray, and silver materials fit together perfectly to produce an air of sophistication. In theBuick, burnt-orange plastics elicit comparisons to spray-tanned skin, contours on the door panels and dashboard don't align, and visible gaps betray ill-fittingtrim pieces.Buick's bright, legible Intellilink display is let down by an annoyingly small joystick. The Encore's interior is pleasant, but just less cohesive than the BMW's.

Though we prefer the BMW X1's looks, performance, and interior, we find the Buick Encore is more in tune with this fledglingsegment's mission. Its isolated cabin and tidy dimensions are better suited to urban driving than the BMW's hefty steering and stiff suspension. The Encore is easier to drive in traffic, quieter, less punishing over rough roads, and nearly as spacious inside as the X1.Last but not least, there's the matter of price. Equipped with every option save a sunroof, our Encore's $32,320 sticker is still $1165 less than the starting price of an X1 xDrive28i. Adding equivalent features -- navigation, heated front seats and steering wheel, backup camera, satellite radio-- pushedour BMW tester's cost to $45,095. Is the prestige of parking a Roundel badge in your driveway worth the $12,865 leap between these models? Perhaps it is for empty nesters downsizing from a bigger crossover. But for members of Gen Y with an entry-level paycheck and five-figure student debt,the Buick -- despite the brand's geriatric reputation -- may be the right choice.

That the Encore isa legitimate contender to the X1 shows how much easier it is to improve a cheap car than to hold a luxury model down to a price. Starting with cheap, Korean-market underpinnings allowed Buick to keep the sticker low despite adding upscale trimmings. It was a greater challenge for BMW to craft an affordable car while preserving the qualities of its other models. The good news is that the X1 will not dilute BMW's brand cachet because it's just as rewarding to drive, look at, and ride in as the rest of the lineup. The bad newsis that the Encore is nearly as good for a whole lot less money. The Germans should be offended; the Americans, flattered.

Both companies, however, should feel vindicated for their decision to be the first on the U.S. market, where customers traditionally want as big a vehicle as they can afford. BMW sold 26,512 X1s in calendar 2013, the model's first full year in the U.S. market. Buick sold 31,956 Encores. That's not the smashing success both cars have enjoyed in Europe (where the Encore is sold as the Opel Mokka), but shows there is potential. Hipster parents, rejoice.

Specifications:

2013 BMW X1 xDrive28i
Price as tested: $45,095
Engine: 2.0L I-4 turbo, 240 hp and 255 lb-ft
Transmission: 8-speed automatic
Drive: 4-wheel
Fuel Economy: 22/33/26 mpg (city/highway/combined)
Cargo space (seats up/down): 27.6/63.6 cubic feet

2013 Buick Encore AWD
Price as tested: $32,230
Engine: 1.4L I-4 turbo, 138 hp and 148 lb-ft
Transmission: 6-speed automatic
Drive: 4-wheel
Fuel Economy: 23/30/26 mpg (city/highway/combined)
Cargo space (seats up/down): 18.8/48.4 cubic feet

05 Feb, 2014


-
Source: http://www.automobilemag.com/reviews/driven/1402-2013-buick-encore-awd-vs-bmw-x1-xdrive28i-comparison/
--
Manage subscription | Powered by rssforward.com

News Daily digest for 04 Feb, 2014

Toyota Camry Tops January Midsize Sales, Honda Accord Falls to Fourth
04 Feb, 2014 - Automobile Magazine News & Rumors

The Toyota Camry led a dismal January for the midsize sedan class, with sales of 23,332 units. The Nissan Altima was second with 22,515 units sold, a gain of almost 5 percent from January 2013. Third place went to the Ford Fusion, which barely pulled ahead of the Honda Accord with 20,717 units sold versus 20,604 units for the Honda.
In a distant fifth place was the Chevrolet Malibu, which sold 11,822 units. The Chrysler 200 was one of the few midsizers to see a gain in January, taking sixth place with 10,912 units sold. In a rare reversal of fortunes, the Kia Optima has surpassed its corporate cousin, the Hyundai Sonata. The Optima managed to find 9979 buyers in January, while the Hyundai Sonata was just below that at 9815 units sold. With 6236 units sold, the Volkswagen Passat was bumped to ninth place.
The Dodge Avenger found itself in the bottom three, with sales of 4795 units for the month, down 50 percent from the same period last year. The Mazda6 sold 3172 units, an improvement of almost 48 percent over the 2147 previous-gen sedans sold in January 2013. In last place was the aging Subaru Legacy, which managed 2735 sales. A new 2015 Subaru Legacy debuts this week at the Chicago auto show.
Model Jan-14 Jan-13 Year-to-Date
Toyota Camry 23,332 31,897 23,332
Nissan Altima 22,515 21,464 22,515
Ford Fusion 20,717 22,399 20,717
Honda Accord 20,604 23,924 20,604
Chevrolet Malibu 11,822 15,823 11,822
Chrysler 200 10,912 8,846 10,912
Kia Optima 9,979 11,252 9,979
Hyundai Sonata 9,815 13,247 9,815
Volkswagen Passat 6,236 8,856 6,236
Dodge Avenger 4,795 9,628 4,795
Mazda6 3,172 2,147 3,172
Subaru Legacy 2735 3,184 2,735

The Polar Vortex put most automakers' sales on ice during the first month of 2014, and the hot-selling compact car segment was as affected just as much the rest of the auto industry. Despite the cool sales, there's always a winner and a loser. January 2014's compact car best-seller by a mere 929 units is the 2014 Toyota Corolla, with 22,753 sold. Last year's compact best-seller, the 2014 Honda Civic came in just behind the Corolla, with 21,824 sold.
Coming in a distant third place last month was the Chevrolet Cruze. Though the 16,828 Cruzes sold pales in comparison to the Corolla and Civic, Chevy noted a 15.9 percent uptick in sales versus January 2013, making it one of the few vehicles in the segment to trend upwards year-over-year. Fourth place last month went to another vehicle on the upswing: the Hyundai Elantra. Hyundai sold 15,326 Elantras last month, a 26 percent year-over-year increase. The Ford Focus – the likely recipient of a facelift this year due to slowing sales – came in fifth place, with 12,003 sold.
Combined sales of the Volkswagen Jetta and the soon-to-be-replaced Jetta Sportwagen earned the Jetta sixth place, with 9768 sold. The Nissan Sentra was hot on the Jetta's tail, with 9127 sold. Eighth place went to the Mazda3 with 6234 sold, while the combined sales of the Subaru Impreza and out-going Impreza WRX came in ninth with 5785 sold. An interesting note regarding the Impreza – the Impreza WRX and WRX STI has been continuously beating the newer Impreza in sales; we're curious to see what happens when the 2015 Subaru WRX goes on sale this spring.
The Dodge Dart rounded out the top 10 with 5051 sold. The Kia Forte finished outside the top 10, with 4724 sold. Last place for January 2014 went to the soon-to-be-replaced Volkswagen Golf/ GTI/Golf R, with just 1702 sold.
Check out the full breakdown below.
Model Jan-14 Year-to-Date
Toyota Corolla 22,753 22,753
Honda Civic 21,824 21,824
Chevrolet Cruze 16,828 16,828
Hyundai Elantra 15,326 15,326
Ford Focus 12,003 12,003
Volkswagen Jetta/Sportwagen 9,768 9,768
Nissan Sentra 9,127 9,127
Mazda3 6,234 6,234
Subaru Impreza/WRX/STI 5,785 5,785
Dodge Dart 5,051 5,051
Kia Forte 4,724 4,724
Volkswagen Golf/GTI/R 1,712 1,712

In a few years, your car may be able to communicate with other cars on the road. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) announced this week that it plans to integrate this vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) communication technology into more and more vehicles going forward as a result of a year-long pilot program that has just finished up in Michigan.
This testing phrase began in August 2012 in Ann Arbor, Michigan, and incorporated 3000 vehicles on public roads to test V2V technology. These systems operate on short-distance Wi-Fi-based networks and allow vehicles to communicate with each other to transmit information about traffic jams as well as vehicle speed and position to help drivers avoid crashes. A car might warn its driver that another driver is running a red light, for instance. NHTSA emphasizes that V2V systems do not record vehicle tracking or any other personal information about the vehicle, meaning that vehicles would not be identifiable due to the many layers of security and privacy protection.
The next step will be a research report on this year-long safety study published by NHTSA with analysis of findings in the areas of feasibility, security, cost estimates, and projected safety benefits. Then, once this report is released, NHTSA will get to work on coming up with a proposal for regulations that would require V2V devices to be put in new vehicles at some point in the future.
At this early stage, the Department of Transportation is estimating that V2V has the potential to either avoid or mitigate 70 to 80 percent of vehicle crashes when the driver is unimpaired. Numerous automakers like Volvo, Lexus, and Ford have outlined their interest in V2V systems as part of their active safety research efforts. This type of vehicle technology could clearly make significant inroads in the area of vehicle safety, so we'll see over the next few years how V2V systems propagate onto new vehicles.

Wörth am Rhein, Germany - When my wife, Victoria, asked me to help plan our dream European vacation, she didn't think we'd be spending an entire day at a truck factory. But that is what's on the docket for our second day in Germany.
To be fair, this isn't just any truck factory. This is the Mercedes-Benz Special Trucks assembly line. This is the line that produces some of the most capable off-road vehicles in the world. This is the line that builds one of the most storied, significant nameplates in the Mercedes-Benz portfolio.
This is the home of the Mercedes-Benz Unimog.
Unimogs might be classified as medium-duty trucks, but dismissing them as simply big trucks is like brushing off da Vinci as "some painter." Each Unimog is handbuilt, like an AMG engine. Each truck packs perhaps more technology than an S-class -- but don't look for a hot-stone massaging seat. And depending on what options are selected at the factory, a Unimog might look more like a tractor, a train, or a tank than anything you'd consider to be a truck.
A quick stroll through the Unimog Museum, located near the plant in Gaggenau that built Unimogs for more than fifty years, gives us a good idea of how versatile this Mercedes truly is. We're surrounded by 'Mogs of all ages, shapes, and sizes, each equipped for different tasks. Farming, fire-fighting, forestry, snowblowing, wood chipping, rally racing -- the possibilities are seemingly endless. Hans-JĂ¼rgen Wischhof, who ran the Unimog division from 1990 through 2003 and now serves as a consultant to the museum, tells us "the Unimog can do anything but fly or swim."
Once upon a time, the Unimog's purpose was rather simple. Although the Morgenthau Plan was never fully implemented after World War II, its proposal to transform Germany into an agrarian state resonated with Albert Friedrich, an aircraft engineer working at Daimler-Benz. Friedrich envisioned that Germans would need a versatile agricultural machine with seating for two, four-wheel drive, ample cargo room, a trailer hitch, and a mounting point for powered attachments that could be used on the farm. Portal axles, which place the wheel hubs below the actual axle shafts, were considered essential because they increased ground clearance -- a key element when driving in a plowed field.
After convincing Allied authorities that he wasn't building a military vehicle, Friedrich and his team of engineers produced the first Universalmotorgerät, or "universal motor vehicle," in late 1946. The first production models, built by the Boehringer machine shop, rolled off the line in 1948, but by 1950 Daimler had purchased the production rights and moved Unimog assembly to its own facility in Gaggenau. Shortly after, the Unimog lineup split in two: a smaller, multipurpose model sold to farmers, municipalities, and industries; and a larger model that catered to cus- tomers -- often foreign military powers -- seeking a vehicle with unrivaled off-road capabilities.
That dualistic model line continues today. The Unimog U4000 and U5000, derived from the models launched nearly forty years ago, are known as the "off-roaders" and boast extreme approach and departure angles plus ground clearance that makes a G-class seem like a lowrider. The Unimog U300, U400, and U500 are considered the "implement carrier" models and are aimed at municipalities, utility companies, farmers, and so on. These trucks can have up to four implement-attachment points, three PTOs (power-takeoff shafts), powerful hydraulic circuits, and insane 24-speed semiautomatic transmissions complete with fold-away clutch pedals.
Of course, the implement carriers still retain the hallowed portal axles, locking differentials, and massive ground clearance. As Wischhof says, "No one will buy a Unimog if he or she cannot have that off-road capability."
The models share a common assembly line in Wörth -- which, in turn, is shared with two other uncommon Mercedes-Benz trucks: the low-entry Econic cabover, and the massive Zetros off-road truck. All three trucks are assembled in Building 20, which Daimler calls the "factory within the factory." The plant at large employs some 12,000 workers, but only 865 are assigned to the Special Trucks line, and only after they've completed a yearlong training program on top of their normal three-year apprenticeship. Basic cab structures and engines are shipped in from elsewhere, but every other part of a Unimog is hand-assembled at the facility.
We arrive at the assembly line during a transition period: not only has production of the new Euro 6-compliant models begun in earnest, but some of the very last cab-forward U20 models -- which are being discontinued after the 2013 model year -- are also moving slowly down the line. After walking along the entire production line, we head to the back of the property. Nestled between a storage lot for recently assembled trucks and a finger of the Rhine River is the Piglet, a small off-road course used for customer demonstrations. We're ogling the terrain when a silver U4000 cargo hauler whips around a corner and stops in front of us. It's time for a quick ride.
The truck has two doors, but there are also two passenger seats. Victoria and I climb some three and a half feet into the cab. The cab is six and a half feet wide, but as the middleman, I'm brushing shoulders with both the driver and my wife.
"You're in good hands," our guide tells us. "Your driver, an employee on the Unimog line, vacations at Dakar."
"Oh, he visits Senegal?"
"No," we're told. "He uses vacation days to compete in the Dakar Rally."
We make our way slowly around the soupy stomping grounds, the Unimog's 4.8-liter, four-cylinder turbo-diesel clattering loudly against the subtle whine of the gearbox. A little knob on the dashboard, to the right of the gauge cluster, commands the four-wheel drive. Click it one stop, and the center differential locks, turning a rear-wheel-drive 'Mog into a four-wheel-drive vehicle. Crank it to the next stop, and the rear differential locks, splitting power evenly between both rear wheels. Dial it to the fourth position, and the same effect is applied to the front wheels.
For most of our brief romp, the U4000 is kept in four-wheel drive, but our driver rarely -- if ever -- uses the other diff locks as we crawl our way around the sloppy course. He nudges the passenger side of the truck up an embankment next to the path, demonstrating the Unimog's ability to travel on 38-degree side slopes -- and, for that matter, the usefulness of the ceiling-mounted "Oh, ScheiĂŸe!" handle above my head, which you can grab when you're trying to avoid crushing the person seated next to you. Crawler gears allow us to creep slowly down a steep embankment, leaving us hanging in our seatbelts like giant marionettes.
This track takes advantage of only a fraction of the Unimog's abilities; the truck isn't even breathing hard. Victoria and I, however, are laughing hysterically. Our driver, who speaks little English, interprets this as a sign to increase our pace sevenfold, especially over a series of jumps that wouldn't be out of place on a motocross track. The ride isn't rough, but the frequent change in both yaw and pitch means it's a good thing we're going through these motions before eating lunch.
Interestingly, there's one piece of land the Unimog has trouble tackling: North America. Although off-road enthusiasts have independently imported vintage models, official attempts at selling the Unimog in the United States and Canada have been spotty, at best. J. I. Case sold Unimogs as agricultural machines from 1975 to 1980, and a handful of independent importers hawked Unimogs in the States after Case washed its hands of the machine. Daimler itself gave it a try in 2003, selling the then-new U500 through select Freightliner dealers in North America. Citing upcoming changes in emissions standards, it withdrew the U500 from the market in 2007, having sold no more than 200 U.S.-spec 'Mogs.
"We didn't exactly have the success we wanted in America," admits Wulf Aurich, product manager for the Unimog line. "The truck is ideal for the confines of European cities. In the States, operators can use big trucks, big trailers, big machines, multiple machines, and it's not a big deal. Here in Germany, an operator or agency will have one garage, and there's no room for multiple pieces of equipment. They do, however, have room for one Unimog and a range of attachments."
Emissions compliance poses a bigger headache for the Unimog. Aurich says refederalizing the U500 wouldn't be too difficult since most of the work has already been done, but certifying the Unimog's diesel engine to North American EPA standards would cost millions. As volumes would be well below 100 trucks annually, there's no chance Daimler could amortize the development cost.
"I can't predict the future of the Unimog in the U.S.," Aurich continues. "But so long as there's no common emissions standards, I think the last U.S.-spec U500 will be the last new Unimog for America."
As far as Aurich is concerned, the Unimog's future isn't in North America but in efficient powertrains and efficient packaging. "Customers are always asking for a smaller Unimog," he says. "There's always lots of work to do on walkways, pathways, and so on, but on the other hand, we can't add complexity to the product. Likewise, we need to look at transitioning the diesel driveline to something else. Natural gas? Electric? A mixture of the two? It's a question we will need to face."
Since Daimler is in the process of launching a new family of Unimogs, these dreams are still some way off. "We have a new product family, and its life cycle should be ten to fifteen years," Aurich points out. "We don't know what customers will be asking for at that point."
Perhaps not -- but I do know when I'll be talking to Victoria about a return trip to Wörth am Rhein . . .

How Can I Use A Unimog?

  • Compete in a desert rally
  • Rescue a stranded commuter train
  • Tend fields
  • Fight fires
  • Clear snow
  • A night at the opera

The Ford Escape kicked off 2014 by topping the compact crossover segment last month. Sales for many brands slipped in January, with some automakers blaming the chilly weather that affected much of the country in recent weeks. But with 19,459 units sold, the Escape managed to pull ahead of the Honda CR-V, which went home to 18,232 customers last month. The Toyota RAV4, which sold 16,880 units, was the only model on the podium to experience an uptick, with a 45.4-percent gain compared to January 2013.
Finishing fourth was the Chevrolet Equinox with 14,547, followed by the Nissan Rogue (13,831 units), which posted a 54.5-percent jump compared to the same period last year. Coming in fifth and sixth place were the Subaru Forester and 2014 Jeep Cherokee with 10,771 and 10,505 units, respectively, while the GMC Terrain was at a distant seventh with 7063 vehicles sold. Despite the presence of the new Cherokee, the Jeep Patriot managed to move 5577 units last month, a 6-percent year-over-year jump. Rounding off the top-10 sellers was the Mazda CX-5, which was just two units shy of reaching 5000.
Among the bottom of the list is the Subaru XV Crosstrek, though the quirky crossover continues to make gains, including a 73-percent jump in sales last month. The Hyundai Tucson and Kia Sportage were relatively unchanged compared to January 2013, though the Volkswagen Tiguan and Mini Countryman and Paceman slipped a bit.
Crossover  Jan-14 Jan-13 YTD
Ford Escape 19,459 19,939 19,459
Honda CR-V 18,232 17,809 18,232
Toyota RAV4 16,880 11,610 16,880
Chevrolet Equinox 14,547 17,223 14,547
Nissan Rogue 13,831 8951 13,831
Subaru Forester 10,771 6565 10,771
Jeep Cherokee 10,505 0 10,505
GMC Terrain 7063 8550 7063
Jeep Patriot 5577 5248 5577
Mazda CX-5 4998 5242 4998
Subaru XV Crosstrek 4801 2764 4801
Jeep Compass 4068 3116 4068
Hyundai Tucson 3533 3493 3533
Nissan Juke 3442 2361 3442
Kia Sportage 2587 2422 2587
Volkswagen Tiguan 1777 2114 1777
Mini Countryman/Paceman 1185 1416 1185

We've known power and towing figures for the 2014 Ram 1500 EcoDiesel for some time, but until now, fuel economy figures were a corporate secret. No more: on the eve of the 2014 Chicago auto show, Chrysler announced its diesel-fueled half-ton pickup is EPA rated at 20 mpg city, 28 mpg highway, and 23 mpg combined.
Those ratings are for rear-wheel drive 2014 Ram 1500 EcoDiesel models, though we've heard rumblings that four-wheel drive Ram 1500s equipped with the new 3.0-liter turbo-diesel V-6 and eight-speed automatic transmission will only be roughly 1 mpg lower. Either way, they affirm our initial hypothesis from our first drive, where we predicted the 2014 Ram 1500 EcoDiesel "should easily eclipse the 25 mpg highway achieved by the 3.6-liter V-6" offered on the Ram, which is also mated with an eight-speed automatic transmission. For that matter, it also beats the V-6's 17-mpg city rating, and trounces the 15/22 mpg (city/highway) returned by a Ram 1500 fitted with the 5.7-liter Hemi V-8 and eight-speed automatic transmission.
This rating also allows Ram to springboard itself to the front of the full-size pickup pack, and claim best-in-class fuel economy once again. Compared to a rear-wheel drive 2014 Chevrolet Silverado or GMC Sierra equipped with the base 4.3-liter V-6, the 2014 Ram 1500 EcoDiesel bests both trucks by two mpg in the city, four mpg on the highway, and three mpg combined. The EcoDiesel is not only rated higher than the 2014 Ford F-150's 3.7-liter V-6 in terms of fuel economy, but also its closest competitor in terms of displacement and power: an F-150 equipped with the optional 3.5-liter, twin-turbocharged EcoBoost V-6.
Official EPA fuel economy ratings for two-wheel-drive, full-size pickups are compiled below.
Make/ Model Powertrain EPA City EPA Highway EPA Combined
2014 Ram 1500 EcoDiesel 3.0L turbo-diesel V-6; 8AT 20 mpg 28 mpg 23 mpg
2014 Ram 1500 3.6L V-6; 8AT 17 mpg 25 mpg 20 mpg
2014 Ram 1500 5.7L V-8; 8AT 15 mpg 22 mpg 17 mpg
2014 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 4.3L V-6; 8AT 18 mpg 24 mpg 20 mpg
2014 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 5.3L V-8; 6AT 16 mpg 23 mpg 19 mpg
2014 Ford F-150 3.7L V-6; 6AT 17 mpg 23 mpg 19 mpg
2014 Ford F-150 EcoBoost 3.5L twin-turbocharged V-6; 6AT 16 mpg 22 mpg 18 mpg
2014 Toyota Tundra 4.0L V-6; 5AT 16 mpg 20 mpg 17 mpg
2014 Toyota Tundra 4.6L V-8; 6AT 15 mpg 19 mpg 16 mpg
2014 Nissan Titan 5.6L V-8; 5AT 13 mpg 18 mpg 15 mpg
If that isn't interesting enough, the Ram EcoDiesel's EPA ratings also put it in the neighborhood of many four-cylinder midsize pickups. A two-wheel drive Nissan Frontier equipped with a 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine and a five-speed manual transmission is rated at 19/23 mpg (city/highway/combined). The Ram even manages to beat the best in the midsize class – the two-wheel-drive Toyota Tacoma with a 2.7-liter four-cylinder and a five-speed manual – by three miles per gallon in the highway rating.
The 3.0-liter turbo-diesel V-6 is available on any 2014 Ram 1500 Tradesman, SLT, Big Horn, Outdoorsman, and Laramie (Limited/Longhorn) model so long as they're not regular cab trucks built with the short six-foot bed. Predictably, adding the EcoDiesel to a 2014 Ram 1500 doesn't exactly come cheap. Ram states the EcoDiesel option package runs $2850 more than a comparable 1500 equipped with both the 5.7-liter Hemi V-8 and the eight-speed automatic transmission. As such, a two-wheel-drive 1500 Tradesman regular cab pickup with the eight-foot box and the EcoDiesel should carry a base price of $31,265, including destination, which amounts to a $4470 premium for the diesel engine. On models like the Laramie, Laramie Longhorn, and Laramie Limited – which all boast the 5.7-liter V-8 and eight-speed automatic as standard – the EcoDiesel commands only a $2850 premium.
Ram may have won the fuel-economy battle for the time being, but the war is anything but over. The new aluminum-intensive 2015 Ford F-150 is just around the corner, and its combination of materials, aerodynamic tricks (some of which were pioneered by the Ram), and a smaller 2.7-liter twin-turbocharged EcoBoost V-6 may boost efficiency. GM is also said to be readying a range of 10-speed automatic transmissions for its future full-size trucks. On the diesel front, Nissan's next-generation Titan promises to offer a new Cummins-sourced 5.0-liter turbo-diesel V-8.
If competition truly improves the breed, look for a greatly enhanced full-size pickup market to emerge over the next several years.

Our spy photographers got a closer look at the upcoming high-performance variant of the 2015 Ford Mustang. Compared to the last time we spotted one of these prototypes -- which is expected to be called the GT350 -- this test car wears far less camouflage, revealing more details about its innards.
Given that the standard 2015 Ford Mustang has made its public debut, we're not surprised by the general shape of this test car. However, the quartet of large exhausts fitted beneath its rear bumper do stand out compared to the twin exhausts of a normal Mustang GT. It's also clear that the car packs enough power to need serious taming, as the rear wheels wear fat 295/35/R19 rubber.
Out front, the camouflage tape does allow us to seem a prominent cooling air vent in the hood, hinting that this car may use forced induction, just as did the outgoing Ford Shelby GT500. We're told, however, that the GT500's massive 662-hp, supercharged 6.2-liter V-8 won't fit in the new 2015 Ford Mustang. Reports suggested that we could expect a naturally aspirated 5.0-liter V-8, but these photos hint that engine could even be supercharged. Alternatively, given that Ford now offers a turbocharged V-6 in the new Mustang, we could see a high-powered turbo model for the GT350.
Speaking of which, the name GT350 has been freed up because Shelby American ceased selling its own Mustang upgrade package by the same name. As a result, the new high-performance Mustang is expected to be called the GT350.
The 2015 Ford Mustang will offer buyers a choice of three engines, a 3.7-liter V-6 rated for 300 hp, an evolution of the 5.0-liter V-8 good for at least 420 hp, and a new turbocharged 2.3-liter inline-four EcoBoost engine making at least 305 hp.
When the standard 2015 Ford Mustang launched, chief engineer Dave Pericak wouldn't confirm to us whether or not a GT350 model was coming. While he didn't deny the possibility of a go-fast Mustang, he told us at the time, "Let's celebrate this one [the standard car] for now." Don't expect to see this GT350 debut until much later this year -- Ford will likely want to delay its introduction until the hype around the standard 2015 Ford Mustang has diminished.

Audi is looking to get a strong foothold on the zero-emission luxury SUV market, reportedly moving forward with plans to develop an all-wheel-drive all-electric Audi Q8 e-tron SUV that will compete directly with the forthcoming Tesla Model X.
We already know that the Q8 will be a sleeker, sportier take on the upcoming 2014 Audi Q7, which will be built on Volkswagen's new MLB platform. According to Autocar, the Audi Q8 e-tron will use electric motor and battery components from the recently resurrected Audi R8 e-tron electric supercar (pictured), and shoot for a 370-mile total range.
The seven-passenger, gullwing-door Tesla Model X is expected to debut in late 2014 following delays, while the Audi Q8 e-tron will not hit showrooms until 2017. Other engine options for the Audi Q8 should include a pair of gasoline V-6 engines making 230 hp and 300 hp; a pair of TDI engines, namely a 3.0-liter 250-hp V-6 and a 4.2-liter 400-hp V-8; and a top-shelf 550-hp twin-turbo 4.0-liter V-8 for the S Q8 model.
While Audi has long made all-wheel-drive available as an option on nearly all of its vehicles, Ingolstadt's next generation will apparently expand electric and hybrid options across its model lineup. The strategy seeks to capitalize on the growing demand for luxury electric vehicles, as evidenced by the success of the Tesla Model S. Autocar reports that Audi believes that future luxury customers will want to ensure their vehicles are as green as possible.
Rumored to reach production as a future Audi TT e-tron, an all-wheel-drive e-tron formula was featured prominently on the Audi Allroad Shooting Brake concept that debuted at the 2014 Detroit auto show. The hybrid powerplant totaled 402 hp from its 2.0-liter turbo four-cylinder engine and twin electric motors. While that concept had an all-electric range of just 31 miles, advances in battery technology by the time the model comes to production could result in a significantly larger figure. The Audi Allroad Shooting Brake concept also provides a useful look at the styling direction Audi will likely take for its even-numbered Q-cars; the Q8 is expected to employ the same high beltline, long roofline, raked rear hatch, and chrome trim.
Look for more news on the upcoming Audi Q8 and its electric variant sometime after the next-gen Audi Q7 debuts this year.

The 2015 Volvo XC90 SUV will be the first Volvo to follow the stylish design direction of the well-received Volvo Concept XC Coupe, and our spy photographer caught a camouflaged version of this luxury crossover testing on ice. Although this prototype is heavily disguised, we can see that the XC90 will have a similar greenhouse as the current car, with a longer hood and a curvier rear end to up its style quotient.
The longer front end of the new Volvo XC90 looks to mirror the swept-back headlights and prominent rectangular grille of the Concept XC Coupe. Moving along the side, the beltline rises toward the rear and tapers toward the slightly rounded roofline. Each of the pillars looks relatively thin, which should make for good outward visibility, and the tailgate has a less-aggressive slope than the smaller Volvo XC60 to accommodate the third row of seats. We expect the Volvo XC90 to retain the brand's traditional vertical taillights, and the lower taillight area that's visible in these photos seems to retain the broad rear hips from the Concept XC Coupe.
We already know a fair bit of information about the 2015 Volvo XC90, as Volvo previously announced that this SUV will ride on the company's new modular platform, called SPA. This platform will go on to underpin many other future Volvos, and it is designed to accommodate the new Drive-E family of turbo- and supercharged powertrains. This means we should see two four-cylinder engines among the XC90's powertrain options. The first would be the turbocharged 2.0-liter four-cylinder that makes 240 hp and 258 lb-ft of torque, and another possibility would be the same 2.0-liter engine that's turbocharged and supercharged to make 302 hp and 295 lb-ft of torque. It's also likely that Volvo will offer at least one XC90 variant with one of its existing turbocharged five- and six-cylinder engines.
Volvo also plans to offer a full suite of active safety technologies on the 2015 XC90, including a steering assist function for the adaptive cruise control, a system that monitors the edges of the road, and an updated pedestrian detection system that can identify pedestrians and cyclists in the dark. These features go towards Volvo's goal of having no fatalities in any new Volvo by 2020.
We expect the 2015 Volvo XC90 to debut later this year, possibly at the 2014 Los Angeles auto show in November before it goes on sale in spring 2015.

Buyers of the 2014 Toyota Camry Hybrid now have another option, the SE Limited Edition trim level. The upgrade is limited to just 5000 cars and essentially copies over the visual flair of the non-hybrid Camry SE to the fuel-sipping hybrid.
The car is based on a 2014 Toyota Camry Hybrid XLE, but adds the sportier front and rear fascias, side skirts, tinted headlights, trunklid spoiler, and 17-inch wheels from the regular Camry SE. A four-spoke leather-wrapped steering wheel, as well as a silver trim pieces and Camry SE seats, dress up the car's interior. If you're thinking it sounds like a mild upgrade, you're right.
Regardless of trim packages, the 2014 Toyota Camry Hybrid uses a 2.5-liter inline-four engine and electric motor that produce a combined 200 hp. The car is rated for 40/38 mpg (city/highway) in XLE and SE trim levels, whereas the 2014 Toyota Camry Hybrid LE manages 43/39 mpg thanks in part to its lighter, narrower wheels.
Although it isn't a particularly dramatic change, Toyota is limiting the number of SE Limited Edition hybrids to 5000 cars, and will only sell the trim package from now through June. The 2014 Toyota Camry Hybrid SE Limited Edition starts at $28,655 after destination. The only optional upgrade package costs $2215 and bundles together a moonroof and touchscreen navigation. Buyers will be able to pick any interior or exterior color combination from a regular Camry SE, and the cars will wear special badges advertising them as the SE Limited Edition.

When the Bugatti EB 18/4 Veyron concept made its debut at the Tokyo auto show in 1999, it marked the beginning of an era which would see the French sports car brand atop the performance automotive heap. The Bugatti EB 18/4 Veyron concept was the starting point for the Bugatti's world-record-setting Bugatti Veyron 16.4, and the design study will now be displayed publically for the first time since its original reveal.
The eighteen-cylinder Bugatti EB 18/4 Veyron concept, scheduled for display this summer at the 2014 Salon RĂ©tromobile in Paris, was created as an homage to Pierre Veyron, who was a decorated driver for Bugatti during the 1930s. Bugatti's shocking design was nearly as dramatic as the car's reported performance capability, an unbelievable 252 mph top speed that Bugatti announced in 2001. The 1001-hp, quad-turbo, W-16 Bugatti Veyron 16.4 took the world by storm when it first made delivery to customers in late 2005, complete with its staggering $1.3 million sticker price. Only around fifty units were scheduled for delivery per year, and production of the Bugatti Veyron 16.4 and even-battier 1200-hp Veyron 16.4 Super Sport, unveiled in 2010, totaled just 300 units—now completely sold out. The Veyron 16.4 Super Sport had a 258 mph top speed and a dizzying 2.5-second 0-62mph sprint.
Bugatti claims that around forty Bugatti Veyron 16.4 Grand Vitesse roadsters are still available, which would ostensibly be the final new Veyron models available in the world. For those of you wondering why Bugatti picked now of all times to show its original Veyron concept, it probably is not in order to give the Veyron a swan song as it warp-speeds off into the sunset. News recently broke that Bugatti has canceled its planned Galibier luxury sport sedan in favor of a Veyron successor, which could be the rumored 1600-hp "SuperVeyron" powered by either a retuned 8.0- or 9.6-liter W-16 engine. Sources estimate that the ultra-performance Bugatti could reach 60 mph from a dead stop in 1.8 seconds on its way to a 288-mph top speed. Yikes.
It's been nearly 15 years since the Bugatti EB 18/4 Veyron took the stage in Tokyo in 1999, and it's high time for some big news out of Molsheim, France. The exhibit in Paris will also feature a display detailing the original configurations of the 300 Veyron coupes, which could provide the context for a major reveal. Check back for more updates about Bugatti and the Salon Rétromobile as more information becomes available.

--
Powered by rssforward.com









Tuesday, February 4, 2014

Bugatti : Galibier is officially dead, next second-generation Veyron


After multiple delays, Volkswagen will ultimately shut down the Bugatti Galibier project, tossing out plans for the ultra-luxury four-door super sedan in favor of a more-powerful successor to the famed Bugatti Veyron. The current Veyron will officially come to rest, according to an Autocar report which also confirms that plans for a higher-output version of the existing model have also been scrapped.

The Bugatti Galibier first appeared as a concept at the company’s Molsheim, France headquarters in 2009. “The Galibier is officially dead,” Volkswagen Group lead Martin Winterkorn told Autocar. “We won’t do it. In its place will be a second-generation Veyron with more power.”

General Motors Company sold 171,486 vehicles in January 2014

General Motors Company, commonly known as GM, is an American multinational corporation headquartered in Detroit, Michigan that designs, manufactures, markets and distributes vehicles and vehicle parts and sells financial services.

11.9 percent decrease over January of last year. All brands were down, with Chevrolet hit hardest at a 13.3 percent decline and Buick faring best with only a 1.4 percent dip in sales. GM blamed extreme winter weather and decreased fleet sales for this decline; among other automakers, Ford was also down this month with a 7 percent decline, and Chrysler posted an 8 percent gain over last year.

Daily digest 02 Feb, 2014

Mexico Now Second-Largest Auto Exporter to U.S., Could Pass Canada Soon
02 Feb, 2014 -
Automobile Magazine News & Rumors
The automotive industry has seen a lot of changes over the last several decades, and one of the most significant changes is where cars are manufactured. Although automakers have had a manufacturing presence in Mexico going back to the 1960s and before, it's only been within the last decade that Mexico has become a large-scale exporter on the order of Japan, Canada and Germany. According to Bloomberg, Mexico has surpassed Japan as the number-two exporter of cars to the U.S., just behind Canada.
In addition, trade agreements with 40 countries worldwide, as well as favorable trade terms with major markets such as Brazil, and a cost of labor 20 percent that of the U.S. have converged to make Mexico a major auto exporting nation. In addition to the Detroit three and Volkswagen, which have had operations in Mexico going back several decades, the Japanese automakers have recently made significant investments in the market, with the most recent examples being Mazda and Honda.
Mexico is also no longer just an exporter of small compacts. The Lincoln MKZ is made in Mexico, and Audi has started construction on a plant in San Jose Chiapas to be the worldwide source of the next-generation Q5 SUV. The passage of the North American Free Trade Agreement in the 1990s is credited with making Mexico a major export hub for the car industry.

India-Market Subcompacts Fare Poorly in Crash Tests
02 Feb, 2014 - Automobile Magazine News & Rumors
Although global regulatory standards are rapidly standardizing in the areas of emissions and safety, there are still some regions that have less-demanding standards, presumably of lowering the cost of new car models in those developing markets. However, a recent test of some Indian-market subcompact models from five manufacturers by Global NCAP revealed some shocking safety shortcomings in the models that could result in regulatory changes for models sold in India.
The Maruti Suzuki Alto 800, Ford Figo, Hyundai i10, Tata Nano and Volkswagen Polo subcompact models were all tested. The Tata Nano fared the worst, receiving zero stars in both adult front occupant protection, as well as child safety. The Hyundai i10 didn't fare much better, also getting zero stars for adult protection, and just one star for infant protection. The best performer was the Volkswagen Polo equipped with dual front airbags, which received four out of five stars for adult front passenger protection, and three stars for child safety. A Polo model without front airbags was also tested, and received zero stars for adult safety. Following the crash test results, Volkswagen announced the Polo model without airbags will no longer be sold in India.
The overall vehicle structures of the Maruti Suzuki, the Tata and the Hyundai were assessed as "unstable" overall, with the structures of the Ford and Volkswagen deemed "stable." The addition of front airbags on the Ford might have resulted in higher crash test scores, similar to the results between the Polo equipped with front airbags compared to the model without them. Rohit Baluja, president of India's Institute of Road Traffic Education, noted that many cars manufactured in India for export already meet more stringent safety standards, so it's just a matter of more stringent regulatory requirements for domestic-market models.
Source: Global NCAP

Rumor: European Law Enforcement Working on Universal Remote Vehicle Disabling
02 Feb, 2014 - Automobile Magazine News & Rumors
Technology is a great servant, but can be a fearsome master. If you're a criminal operating in Europe, or simply a global citizen concerned with the trend of increasing government power and authority, take note. Britain's AutoExpress is reporting that a report leaked from the little-known European Network of Law Enforcement Technology Services (ENLETS) shows that plans are in the works to implement a universal remote vehicle disabling system that could be installed on all new cars as soon as 2020. The report was exposed by Statewatch, a European civil liberties watchdog organization.
Other surveillance and law enforcement technologies discussed in the report include improved license plate recognition and intelligence sharing between police departments in Europe. Such a system is not totally unprecedented, as General Motors built in remote vehicle slowdown capability into OnStar-equipped vehicles built after 2009 with eighth-generation software. In GM's description of the OnStar capability, law enforcement officials, or vehicle owners have to request the feature be activated through OnStar operators, and police do not have direct capability to slow vehicles down unilaterally.
The technology obviously exists to implement such as system in the U.S. as well, but a strong and vocal community of civil liberty watchdogs would likely challenge such a sweeping move by law enforcement in the courts. What do you think? Could the U.S. soon follow the lead of Europe?

--